World Powers Divided Over US–Israel Strikes on Iran
Diplomats gather at the UN Security Council to discuss the fast-evolving crisis in Iran and the whole Middle East region. Photo: UN News

World Powers Divided Over US–Israel Strikes on Iran

Mar 1, 2026 - 10:33
 0

Global powers are sharply divided over the joint US–Israel strikes on Iran, with reactions ranging from outright condemnation to firm defence of the military action. At an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council, diplomats warned of escalating regional instability as accusations of aggression and violations of international law flew across the chamber. As tensions deepen, the crisis has exposed widening geopolitical fault lines over sovereignty, nuclear ambitions and the future of diplomacy in the Middle East.


France: ‘We need Iran to respect its international obligations’

Jérôme Bonnafont of France called for Iran to respect its international obligations, stressing that adherence to international law is “a condition for long-term security in the region and world.” 

Ambassador Bonnafont said that Iran has not taken the opportunity to conclude a nuclear agreement but has instead reduced its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Russia: ‘Another unprovoked act of armed aggression’

Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said that the US-Israeli strikes were “yet another unprovoked act of armed aggression against a sovereign and independent Member State, in violation of the UN Charter and international law.” 

This “reckless step,” he said, has led to a sharp escalation across the region, which he described as a “betrayal of diplomacy”.

China: Territorial integrity of Iran ‘must be respected’

China’s Ambassador Fu Cong described the US-Israeli strikes as “brazen”, condemning the threat of force to settle any international dispute – and calling for the “sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of Iran and other regional countries to be respected.” 

Expressing sadness at the large loss of civilian life during Saturday’s strikes, Ambassador Fu called on all parties to fulfil their obligations under international law and an immediate cessation of military action.

He said it was “shocking” that the US-Israeli attacks had come in the middle of diplomatic negotiations between the US and Iran.

United States: 'Persistent aggression' could not be ignored

Ambassador Mike Waltz of the United States said that the strikes on Iran were directed towards dismantling its ballistic missile capabilities, degrading naval assets being used to destabilise international waters and disrupt the machinery that arms proxy militias. 

The aim, he continued, is to ensure that “the Iranian regime can never, ever threaten the world with a nuclear weapon.”

“No responsible nation can ignore persistent aggression and violence.” he warned, adding that Iran's continued pursuit of advanced missile capabilities, coupled with its refusal to abandon nuclear ambitions – despite diplomatic opportunities – represents “a grave and mounting danger”. 

UK: Regional stability 'a priority’

"This is a fragile moment for the Middle East," said Ambassador James Kariuki of the United Kingdom, Council President for February. "Regional stability remains a priority,” he said, adding that UK forces are active and its planes are in the sky as part of "coordinated regional defensive operations", in line with international law.

"We want to see the swiftest possible resolution that ensures security and stability for the region,” he continued, urging Iran to refrain from further strikes and its “appalling” behaviour to allow a path back to diplomacy.

Iran: Strikes 'devoid of legal foundation'

“This morning, the United States regime - jointly and in coordination with the Israeli regime - initiated an unprovoked and premeditated aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran for the second time in recent months,” said Iran’s Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani.

“This is not only an act of aggression; it is a war crime and a crime against humanity,” he insisted, accusing the US and Israel of deliberately attacking civilian populated areas in multiple large cities. 

“The invocation to ‘pre-emptive attack,’ claims of imminent threat, or other unsubstantiated political claims, are unfounded legally, morally and politically,” Mr. Iravani continued, categorically rejecting the assertions made by the representatives of France, the UK and other Western representatives regarding Iran’s peaceful nuclear programme.

Israel: Attacks ‘an act of necessity’

Israel’s strikes on Iran, said Ambassador Danny Danon, took place to stop “an existential threat before it became irreversible."

His country had acted out of necessity because the regime left no reasonable alternative, building nuclear weapons in disregard for international law, murdering its own citizens and crushing dissent, expanding missile arsenals and arming proxies across the region – all while declaring its intention to erase Israel from the map.

Ambassador Danon said Tehran had been required to stop enriching uranium and to allow full inspections but did not do so. 

“They were building the means to force an irreversible reality with our backs against the wall. That is not a future Israel will accept.”

Pakistan: urges all sides to refrain from further strikes

Pakistan’s Ambassador Asim Ahmad said the US-Israeli attacks would undermine the security of the entire region “with far reaching consequences.”

He likewise condemned Iran’s attacks against Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, stressing Pakistan stands in solidarity with them. 

He said it was especially unfortunate that some of those countries had been supporting the effort to find a diplomatic solution between the US and Iran.

He said diplomacy had once again been “derailed” right in the middle of efforts to reach a diplomatic solution, further eroding trust “that was already in short supply.”

Source: UN News

 

World Powers Divided Over US–Israel Strikes on Iran

Mar 1, 2026 - 10:33
 0
World Powers Divided Over US–Israel Strikes on Iran
Diplomats gather at the UN Security Council to discuss the fast-evolving crisis in Iran and the whole Middle East region. Photo: UN News

Global powers are sharply divided over the joint US–Israel strikes on Iran, with reactions ranging from outright condemnation to firm defence of the military action. At an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council, diplomats warned of escalating regional instability as accusations of aggression and violations of international law flew across the chamber. As tensions deepen, the crisis has exposed widening geopolitical fault lines over sovereignty, nuclear ambitions and the future of diplomacy in the Middle East.


France: ‘We need Iran to respect its international obligations’

Jérôme Bonnafont of France called for Iran to respect its international obligations, stressing that adherence to international law is “a condition for long-term security in the region and world.” 

Ambassador Bonnafont said that Iran has not taken the opportunity to conclude a nuclear agreement but has instead reduced its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Russia: ‘Another unprovoked act of armed aggression’

Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said that the US-Israeli strikes were “yet another unprovoked act of armed aggression against a sovereign and independent Member State, in violation of the UN Charter and international law.” 

This “reckless step,” he said, has led to a sharp escalation across the region, which he described as a “betrayal of diplomacy”.

China: Territorial integrity of Iran ‘must be respected’

China’s Ambassador Fu Cong described the US-Israeli strikes as “brazen”, condemning the threat of force to settle any international dispute – and calling for the “sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of Iran and other regional countries to be respected.” 

Expressing sadness at the large loss of civilian life during Saturday’s strikes, Ambassador Fu called on all parties to fulfil their obligations under international law and an immediate cessation of military action.

He said it was “shocking” that the US-Israeli attacks had come in the middle of diplomatic negotiations between the US and Iran.

United States: 'Persistent aggression' could not be ignored

Ambassador Mike Waltz of the United States said that the strikes on Iran were directed towards dismantling its ballistic missile capabilities, degrading naval assets being used to destabilise international waters and disrupt the machinery that arms proxy militias. 

The aim, he continued, is to ensure that “the Iranian regime can never, ever threaten the world with a nuclear weapon.”

“No responsible nation can ignore persistent aggression and violence.” he warned, adding that Iran's continued pursuit of advanced missile capabilities, coupled with its refusal to abandon nuclear ambitions – despite diplomatic opportunities – represents “a grave and mounting danger”. 

UK: Regional stability 'a priority’

"This is a fragile moment for the Middle East," said Ambassador James Kariuki of the United Kingdom, Council President for February. "Regional stability remains a priority,” he said, adding that UK forces are active and its planes are in the sky as part of "coordinated regional defensive operations", in line with international law.

"We want to see the swiftest possible resolution that ensures security and stability for the region,” he continued, urging Iran to refrain from further strikes and its “appalling” behaviour to allow a path back to diplomacy.

Iran: Strikes 'devoid of legal foundation'

“This morning, the United States regime - jointly and in coordination with the Israeli regime - initiated an unprovoked and premeditated aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran for the second time in recent months,” said Iran’s Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani.

“This is not only an act of aggression; it is a war crime and a crime against humanity,” he insisted, accusing the US and Israel of deliberately attacking civilian populated areas in multiple large cities. 

“The invocation to ‘pre-emptive attack,’ claims of imminent threat, or other unsubstantiated political claims, are unfounded legally, morally and politically,” Mr. Iravani continued, categorically rejecting the assertions made by the representatives of France, the UK and other Western representatives regarding Iran’s peaceful nuclear programme.

Israel: Attacks ‘an act of necessity’

Israel’s strikes on Iran, said Ambassador Danny Danon, took place to stop “an existential threat before it became irreversible."

His country had acted out of necessity because the regime left no reasonable alternative, building nuclear weapons in disregard for international law, murdering its own citizens and crushing dissent, expanding missile arsenals and arming proxies across the region – all while declaring its intention to erase Israel from the map.

Ambassador Danon said Tehran had been required to stop enriching uranium and to allow full inspections but did not do so. 

“They were building the means to force an irreversible reality with our backs against the wall. That is not a future Israel will accept.”

Pakistan: urges all sides to refrain from further strikes

Pakistan’s Ambassador Asim Ahmad said the US-Israeli attacks would undermine the security of the entire region “with far reaching consequences.”

He likewise condemned Iran’s attacks against Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, stressing Pakistan stands in solidarity with them. 

He said it was especially unfortunate that some of those countries had been supporting the effort to find a diplomatic solution between the US and Iran.

He said diplomacy had once again been “derailed” right in the middle of efforts to reach a diplomatic solution, further eroding trust “that was already in short supply.”

Source: UN News